FIFA Agent Disciplinary Code Practice Exam

In what situation can evidence be neglected in FIFA disciplinary procedures?

1. When parties mutually agree to exclude it.

2. When the Judicial body deems it unnecessary.

3. When witnesses refuse to testify.

4. When it poses a potential harm to anonymity.

The correct answer is: When it poses a potential harm to anonymity.

The correct understanding focuses on situations where the integrity and safety of individuals involved in the proceedings is compromised. Neglecting evidence due to the potential harm to anonymity aligns with FIFA's commitment to protecting all parties in the disciplinary process. This situation is particularly relevant in sensitive cases where revealing certain evidence could lead to repercussions for individuals, potentially deterring them from coming forward or affecting their future participation in the sport. This principle emphasizes the balance between a thorough investigation and the safeguarding of identities, ensuring that individuals can participate in the process without fear of retaliation or exposure. Protecting anonymity is crucial in maintaining the overall trust in the disciplinary system and encouraging a culture where concerns can be voiced without fear. While evidence may be excluded in other circumstances, such as mutual agreement or when deemed unnecessary, the focus on anonymity underscores FIFA's recognition of the importance of individual safety in disciplinary matters.