Prepare for the FIFA Agent Disciplinary Code Exam with our comprehensive quiz. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complete with hints and detailed explanations. Ensure your success on exam day!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the effect of interruptive procedural acts regarding prosecution timelines?

  1. Initates a new timeline

  2. Restarts the prosecution time

  3. Has no effect

  4. Extends the timeline by a year

The correct answer is: Restarts the prosecution time

Interruptive procedural acts play a significant role in influencing timelines related to the prosecution of disciplinary matters. The correct answer indicates that such acts cause the prosecution time to restart. When an interruptive procedural act occurs—such as filing a motion, challenging jurisdiction, or any action that halts the ongoing procedure—it effectively resets the timeline for the prosecution. This means that the previous timeline, including any deadlines set for the prosecution to take specific actions, is no longer applicable after the interruptive act takes place. As a result, the reasons for the interruption must be resolved before the prosecution can continue, thus leading to the need for a new timeline. This ensures fairness in the process, allowing all parties to be adequately informed and prepared to proceed after any interruptions. The other options do not accurately reflect the nature of interruptive procedural acts. They do not initiate a new timeline in the sense of completely resetting proceedings in a way that does not account for prior timelines. They also do not merely extend the previous timeline or leave it completely unaffected; instead, they fundamentally reset the process from the point of the interruption.